Police brutality is an important topic affecting communities’ safety and well-being nationwide. But can you define it? California law clearly defines this and other acts of misconduct by members of law enforcement. In this blog post, we aim to provide a comprehensive look at how police brutality is defined in California – from legal definitions to recent cases, breaking down exactly what constitutes unlawful force or conduct by police officers. Hence, you have the information necessary to understand your rights. We’ll also look at one example of a potential police brutality case that recently took place near Los Angeles (Hacienda Heights) to a person named Adrian Cruz. Read on for more!

Understanding California’s Definition of Police Brutality

California has a clear definition of police brutality: the use of excessive force against an individual, who is either in law enforcement custody or under an arrest. In terms of specifics, it means physical force that is unwarranted or any act that goes beyond what is needed to subdue or apprehend an individual. State laws also consider psychological mistreatment as a form of police brutality. For example, if law enforcement officers harass an individual out of racism or bigotry, then this would be seen as a form of excessive force. 

These scenarios are taken quite seriously by courts. Individuals found guilty can expect consequences including financial compensation, legal action and even criminal charges against the involved officer. Because the issue of police brutality has such profound implications for all parties involved, it’s important for individuals to be aware and understand clearly what falls under the domain of police brutality according to the state’s laws.

Relevant California Civil Codes Pertinent to Police Brutality or Similar Cases

California Civil Codes Police Brutality

In California, several civil codes exist that may apply to cases of police brutality. These codes include Civil Code Section 52.1, which prohibits any attempts to interfere with an individual’s statutory or constitutional rights through coercion, intimidation or threats. This code is often cited in instances of police misconduct where an individual’s rights have been violated. You can read more about that here.

Another relevant civil code is Civil Code Section 51.7, which prohibits discrimination based on protected characteristics such as race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, and disability. This code may apply to cases where police brutality is motivated by such factors.

Civil Code Section 52 allows for compensation in cases where personal property has been intentionally or negligently damaged. This code may be pertinent in cases where police actions have resulted in property damage.

Lastly, Civil Code Section 3294 permits punitive damages in situations where the defendant has acted maliciously, recklessly, fraudulently or oppressively. This code may be relevant where the plaintiff seeks additional damages beyond compensatory damages in cases of police brutality.

It is important to note that while these civil codes may be applicable to cases of police brutality, there are also criminal statutes that may apply. It is advisable to consult with an experienced attorney like Kirakosian Law who can provide guidance on the most appropriate course of action based on the specific circumstances of each case.

Overview of Relevant Legal Statutes Pertaining to Police Misconduct

Police misconduct is a serious issue that should be handled properly to ensure the safety and protection of citizens. To this end, several legal statutes have been enacted to address police misconduct. Such laws prohibit officers from performing illegal searches, using excessive force or otherwise violating an individual’s civil rights, with violations punishable by fines, jail time and/or removal from their position. Pre-existing legislation like the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, requires warrants upon probable cause, and protects residents from self-incrimination.

Further protections come in the form of hate crime legislation calling out acts of discrimination in addition to penalties specified by states or local jurisdictions. These laws are essential to ensure that our law enforcement agencies are held accountable for their actions; they serve as a reminder that justice must be served not just to criminals but also those who break the law while serving within it.

Identifying different types of police brutality

Police brutality consists of an array of forms, some more obvious than others. It can involve physical violence, such as the use of unnecessary force when apprehending a suspect or damaging their property after arrest. There is also psychological brutality, which usually involves manipulation and verbal abuse against civilians, including threats and intimidation.

In some cases, officers take advantage of their position by using racial profiling and making false arrests of people suspected of being criminals due to their race or skin color. Abuse of authority is another kind of police brutality; it includes neglecting to fulfill responsibilities – such as failing to enforce laws based on personal bias – as well as unnecessarily harassing victims involved in critical incidents. All forms of police brutality are inexcusable, and it’s important to be aware that these kinds of infringements happen in order to take action accordingly.

Analyzing the consequences of excessive force in California

Excessive force is an overly-zealous use of physical, potentially harmful, force to affect law enforcement. It can have severe consequences, not only in terms of physical harm to the individual on the receiving end, but also psychologically and legally. In California, civil code provides numerous examples of excessive force that could be used as evidence against a person or entity accused of such behavior.

From restricting free movement by unlawfully restraining someone under Civil Code section 835 to assault and battery by threat or actual physical contact in violation of civil code sections 1708.5 and 1708.6, California’s regulations cover a wide range of actions deemed illegal. Moreover, through civil code violations related to malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, and abuse of process personal injury lawyers can help protect victims from excessive force and ensure individuals responsible for the wrongdoing are held liable for any damages caused.

police brutality lawyer message

Examining how victims can seek justice

In California, victims of crime are able to pursue justice in a variety of ways. A recent example was seen in 2020, when the family of Breonna Taylor filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the Louisville Metro Police Department due to their involvement in her killing. In California, such a strategy is also possible—victims can file civil lawsuits that independently seek damages, or they can lodge complaints to relevant state authorities when appropriate.

The district attorney’s office has a core responsibility in prosecuting those who have committed any sort of criminal violation, with victims being allowed input throughout the entire process. Prosecutors must abide by certain rules and principles during this process and their decisions bear great importance for making sure justice is served; if an individual feels these regulations have not been followed appropriately, they may be able to appeal the decision and pursue further legal recourse. Victims are ensured that due process will take place as long as they choose to fight for what is right and just. Legal counsel is always recommended for this very reason.

The Adrian Cruz situation as an example

The Adrian Cruz situation is an example of the consequences faced by communities of color when police misconduct and brutality occur. The lawsuit was brought by a father and husband, and son, but many more have faced similar experiences. In this case, deputies allegedly handcuffed and detained Cruz after mistaking him for a fleeing vehicle suspect.

Incidents like these are troubling and show how law enforcement can target vulnerable individuals instead of protecting them. It also engenders mistrust between law enforcement officers and minority communities who experience such situations at a disproportionately higher rate than others. Greg Kirakosian and Kirakosian Law have had the privilege of working with Mr. Cruz and helping him get the just compensation he deserves.

In Conclusion: Understanding Police Brutality Better Means The Fight Against It Is Stronger

The issue of police brutality is an all too often occurrence in our society that should not be taken lightly. It is important to understand the definition, legal statutes, consequences and rights of victims when dealing with law enforcement officers. We must continuously strive for police accountability standards and advocate for constructive reforms that can help mitigate future incidents.

Taking a closer look at the Adrian Cruz situation we can further see how police misconduct can multiply the effects of trauma suffered by those involved, even leading to death in some cases. We must always recognize the power and authority given to sworn officers and work cooperatively to ensure better protections are in place to prevent unnecessary violence and excessive force.